#gcc #c 20 #c -coroutine
Вопрос:
следующая программа тестирования:
#include <coroutine>
#include <iostream>
#include <optional>
//#define FIX1
//#define FIX2
//#define FIX3
struct final_awaiter
{
std::coroutine_handle<> continuation;
bool await_ready() const noexcept { return false; }
std::coroutine_handle<> await_suspend(std::coroutine_handle<> h) const noexcept
{
std::cout << "resuming continuation=" << continuation.address() << std::endl;
return continuation ? continuation : std::noop_coroutine();
}
void await_resume() const noexcept {}
};
struct schedule
{};
// test...
std::coroutine_handle<> inner_coro;
struct schedule_awaiter
{
bool await_ready() const noexcept { return false; }
void await_suspend(std::coroutine_handle<> h) const noexcept
{
std::cout << "'scheduling' inner_coro h=" << h.address() << std::endl;
inner_coro = h;
}
void await_resume() const noexcept { std::cout << "schedule resumed " << std::endl; }
};
template<typename PromiseType>
struct task_awaiter
{
std::coroutine_handle<PromiseType> handle;
bool await_ready() const noexcept
{
const bool ready = handle.promise().value.has_value();
std::cout << "[task, h=" << handle.address()
<< "] await_ready(), value=" << handle.promise().value.value_or(-1)
<< ", ready=" << (ready ? "YES <<<<< ????? " : "no") << std::endl;
return ready;
}
void await_suspend(std::coroutine_handle<> h) const noexcept
{
std::cout << "[task, h=" << handle.address()
<< "] await_suspend(), saving continuation=" << h.address() << std::endl;
handle.promise().continuation = h;
}
auto await_resume() const noexcept
{
std::cout << "[task, h=" << handle.address()
<< "] await_resume(), returnnig value == " << *handle.promise().value
<< std::endl;
return std::move(*(handle.promise().value));
}
};
struct task
{
struct promise_type
{
#ifdef FIX1
std::coroutine_handle<> continuation; // works (1)
std::optional<int> value;
#else
std::optional<int> value;
std::coroutine_handle<> continuation; // segfaults (1)
#endif
#ifdef FIX3
promise_type() = defau<
explicit promise_type(int) {} // works (3)
#endif
task get_return_object()
{
return task{std::coroutine_handle<promise_type>::from_promise(*this)};
}
std::suspend_never initial_suspend() const noexcept { return {}; }
auto final_suspend() const noexcept { return final_awaiter{continuation}; }
void return_value(int val) noexcept
{
std::cout << "return_value, val=" << val << std::endl;
value = val;
}
[[noreturn]] void unhandled_exception() { std::terminate(); }
// await schedule
auto await_transform(schedule) const noexcept { return schedule_awaiter{}; }
// await task
auto await_transform(const taskamp; t) const noexcept
{
return task_awaiter{t.handle};
}
};
explicit task(std::coroutine_handle<promise_type> handle)
: handle(handle)
{}
task(taskamp;amp; other) noexcept
: handle(std::exchange(other.handle, nullptr))
{}
~task()
{
std::cout << "~task, h=" << handle.address() << std::endl;
if (handle) { handle.destroy(); }
}
int get() const
{
if (handle) { return *handle.promise().value; }
throw std::logic_error("get(): moved from task");
}
std::coroutine_handle<promise_type> handle;
};
// ---
#ifdef FIX2
task inner() // works (2)
#else
task inner(int r) // segfaults (2)
#endif
{
std::cout << ">> inner 1" << std::endl;
co_await schedule{};
std::cout << ">> inner 2" << std::endl;
co_return 10; // co_return r;
}
task outer()
{
std::cout << "> outer 1" << std::endl;
#ifdef FIX2
auto t = inner(); // works (2)
#else
auto t = inner(5); // segfaults (2)
#endif
std::cout << "> outer 2" << std::endl;
auto r = co_await t;
std::cout << "> outer 3" << std::endl;
co_return r;
}
int main()
{
auto result = outer();
std::cout << "...manually resuming h=" << inner_coro.address() << std::endl;
inner_coro.resume();
std::cout << "result = " << result.get() << std::endl;
}
работает, как и ожидалось, в MSVC:
> outer 1
>> inner 1
'scheduling' inner_coro h=000001A5F5DF1DD0
> outer 2
[task, h=000001A5F5DF1DD0] await_ready(), value=-1, ready=no
[task, h=000001A5F5DF1DD0] await_suspend(), saving continuation=000001A5F5DF0C40
...manually resuming h=000001A5F5DF1DD0
schedule resumed
>> inner 2
return_value, val=10
resuming continuation=000001A5F5DF0C40
[task, h=000001A5F5DF1DD0] await_resume(), returnnig value == 10
> outer 3
return_value, val=10
~task, h=000001A5F5DF1DD0
resuming continuation=0000000000000000
result = 10
~task, h=000001A5F5DF0C40
но segfaults в gcc (godbolt):
> outer 1
>> inner 1
'scheduling' inner_coro h=0x18c354e1770
> outer 2
[task, h=0x18c354e1770] await_ready(), value=5, ready=YES <<<<< ?????
[task, h=0x18c354e1770] await_resume(), returnnig value == 5
> outer 3
return_value, val=5
~task, h=0x18c354e1770
resuming continuation=0
...manually resuming h=0x18c354e1770
Segmentation fault
Похоже, что task::promise_type::value
это перезаписывается inner()
аргументом ‘s ( 5
), поэтому «внутренняя» сопрограмма не приостанавливается, как ожидалось, а завершается/уничтожается, а затем происходит segfault после (ручного) resume()
вызова. Есть ли какая-то ошибка в программе или это ошибка gcc?
Раскомментируйте FIX1
FIX2
или FIX3
«исправьте» segfault…